Skip to main content

Death by Meeting

I wish this was my conference room

Before Christmas I interviewed for a new job. The role for which I was interviewing had more responsibility and would require me to flex a bit more leadership muscle. At that time, I began to ask for recommendations from people who read books on leadership. I was not able to finish the first one I started because it was largely based on political examples from the 1980s. While I am sure the concepts are still relevant, the context made it difficult for me to digest.

Death By Meeting was the next one I tried. This is actually a fiction book that describes itself as a leadership "fable," which is designed to show you the ways that meetings can go wrong and how to better handle them. A lot of the book goes through best practices on structuring meetings and the purposes and values of different types and lengths of meetings.

Like dominoes falling, a series of events occurred after my interview in December that resulted in me eventually accepting the role of area supervisor, which was not the original position for which I interviewed. As area supervisor, I will be conducting monthly meetings with the team. However, the structure suggested in this book will not be possible for me to implement due to the schedule and locations of the virtual staff members. Even though I will not be able to execute meetings as outlined in the book, I still believe there are some good takeaways to remember in order to make meetings tolerable and productive. For those interested, the author suggests having a five minute standing (literally) check-in style meeting at the beginning of each work day. After that, he suggests weekly tactical meetings that have no agenda and last no more than 45 minutes, monthly strategic meetings where only 2 major topics are hashed out in detail for a maximum of about 2 hours, and quarterly off-site meetings that last for longer periods of time and get into greater detail.

For a book with the title Death by Meeting, you may assume he would advocate for fewer or shorter meetings. Instead, he advocates for more productive and focused meetings that result in fewer emails after the fact (that can and usually are misinterpreted). Good meetings will also cut down on what he calls "sneaker time," which is required in order to walk around and talk to everyone individually later about something that wasn't covered sufficiently in the meeting.

Conducting my staff meeting next Friday will be a new experience for me at the office, but I have facilitated meetings in the past when I was leader of Harvest of Talents. Perhaps I should have read this book prior to that!

In case anyone is keeping track:
-I got this book from the Jackson Library at Indiana Wesleyan University
-This book was recommended to me

Popular posts from this blog

A New Direction

Over the course of time, I have had quite a few different blogs with different themes and styles. My domain ( is up for renewal. I thought about not renewing it because I haven't updated this blog since April. In the end, I decided that I'm too sentimental to let it go. I've had this website in all of its various forms for about 20 years. As you can tell (see posts below), I gave up summarizing books back in April. I decided quickly that I preferred reading to summarizing the books in writing afterward. The entire process of writing my thoughts on the books was slowing down my reading pace! As soon as I finish a book, I have another one or two lined up to read next. Stopping to summarize and offer my pithy (I wish) thoughts was a drag. On average, I finished a book every 4.93 days in 2019. Some of these were audiobooks (they still totally count), but most were not (I say that because audiobooks don't really count - lol). Some people read many more b

The Road by Cormac McCarthy

Since this book won the Pulitzer and has been made into a movie, it is likely that most people are already familiar with it. However, I was a little late to the game on this one. The Road is a post-apocalyptic story of a father and son trying to survive. They try to beat winter by heading south while attempting to do so without being noticed by others, some of whom have turned to cannibalism to survive. It's bleak. The manner and style of writing is unique as there are no chapter delineations, no quotation marks, no character names, and infrequent apostrophes. In that way, the style of writing mirrors the unfolding of the story -- going and going with few interruptions, going south, getting to the end, stunted conversation. Just survive. Get through. Simplify things. I found that I moved quickly through the book, which is the opposite of what happens when the chapters are long. Instead, this had no chapters but frequent spaces or gaps in the text, which made it seem OK to

The Collected Schizophrenias

As far as diagnoses go, there's nothing more frightening that schizophrenia -- at least in my book. Some could argue that cancer is scary -- it is certainly a tyrant, but schizophrenia's symptoms can be so unpredictable, bizarre, and varied that is scares me more. In addition, people with schizophrenia may not even know they are ill, which makes any kind of treatment very challenging. As a person trained to work with people with disabilities, I have been taught to use "person first" language. Did you notice above I said, "people with schizophrenia" and not "schizophrenics?" This is evidently a rule you can break if you are a person with schizophrenia as Esmé Weijun Wang is. She makes the point in the book that even the language we use about the disease shows that we fear it -- there is no adjective for cancer that relates to people. So, you may say that someone has cancer, but you wouldn't say that they are  cancer or even cancerous. But